
Ann-Marie Barker blogs on a wide range of Horsell, Woking and national topics. Ann-Marie is a former Horsell councillor and past Leader of the Liberal Democrat group on Woking Borough Council.
Friday, 8 October 2010
WWF Announce Consultation Dates

Thursday, 7 October 2010
Planning Application Round Up
PLAN/2010/0944
A single storey side extension and a first floor extenson over the existing garage for Asha in Horsell Park.
PLAN/2010/0931
Crombie, 30 Thornash Road is seeking a Certificate of Lawful Development for a single storey side extension.
PLAN/2010/0893
Coxhill Farm in Deep Pool Lane is seeking a Certificate of Lawful Development for a two storey rear extension and single storey extensions to north and south elevations. There was previously an application to demolish the existing property on this site and build a new property. This was withdrawn. This is an application to make these changes to the property without the need to submit a full planning application.
PLAN/2010/0798
Application for a single storey rear extension at 18 Tresta Walk.
PLAN/2010/0864
Another single storey rear extension, this one is at 40 Horsell Park Close.
PLAN/2010/0885
Oak Cottage in South Road are seeking to add a single storey rear conservatory to the property.
An application at 90-92 High Street to convert office space to four one bedroom flats has been refused.
Friday, 10 September 2010
New cycle crossing of Victoria Way
I will continue my search and report back when I have full details of this plan.
UPDATE
Shortly after posting this I received the plans for the crossing in the post. As a councillor for the area I was notified directly. This still doesn't answer my issue that it is not easy for local residents to access this information. Why can't such plans go on to the Internet as for planning applications.
I was also made aware by a colleague that as this is the County Council the notice is effectively a "traffic order" not an application and so they will go ahead and build the crossing unless there is a legal objection. In fact work has now begun to clear the bushes and other plants near to the Council offices in preparation for the crosssing.
I have no reason to object to the crossing. A separate cycle crossing makes sense and gives both pedestrians and cyclists more room. I am just unhappy about the process and Surrey's lack of consultation with local people.
Thursday, 9 September 2010
Missing Bus Information
Planning Applications 9 September 2010
Just two this week - one householder application and a Council application.
PLAN/2010/0799
Elwood, Waldens Road, Horsell
Summary description has this as "erection of a replacement dwelling" but looking at the detail of the application it describes two storey side extensions and internal reworking. The property is a relatively small bungalow so it maybe that the planners feel this is effectively a new dwelling. I have queried with the planning officer and will update this post when I have more information.
UPDATE - planning officer has told me that as little of original property will remain and it is two storey extensin to bungalow this is classed as 'erection of replacement dwelling'.
PLAN/2010/0820
Application to retain the recycling centre at Kestrel Way for the next two years. Permission for this small site on Kestrel Way seems to come up for renewal every couple of years.
Update on Horsell Scouts and Guides
The Executive supported the paper and council officers will now progress feasability reports on each of the projects.
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
New home for Horsell Scouts & Guides?

Sunday, 5 September 2010
Buses and Car Parks

Latest Horsell West Planning Applications
The application for the church site on Meadway Drive, close to the junction with the High Street, has been withdrawn. I am sure there will be a further application on this site and will look out for this application.
PLAN/2010/0802
Flagstones Horsell Vale
Extension at side and rear of property, part single and part two storey. This is an amendment to an application permitted in October 2009. An amendment to the 2009 application was refused planning permission earlier this year.
PLAN/2010/0797
Dennington Ridgeway
Erection of a car port in front of existing garage.
PLAN/2010/0825
Dumgoyne Bullbeggars Lane
Erection of detached single garage / store to rear garden.
Monday, 23 August 2010
Latest Update - Littlewick Road
I don't recall the name of the person in Highways but she explained that a hole had been found in the road with a cavity underneath. The County Council had to investigate what had caused the hole. A utility was suspected but this had to be explored. After investigation there was no conclusive evidence of what had caused the hole so it will be fixed by County Council contractors. This should now be done in the next two weeks.
Friday, 20 August 2010
Latest Horsell West Planning Appplications
To view more details of each application and to submit your views click on the application number below. You can also submit a view by email (the officer dealing with the case is detaailed on each application) or write to the Planning Department at Woking BC, referencing the planning application number.
If there are local concerns about an application and ten or more objections are received a complainant is entitled to put their case before the planning committee.
PLAN/2010/0769
Coxhill Farm, Deep Pool Lane, Chobham
Erection of a two storey dwelling and garage following demolition of the existing dwelling on site.
PLAN/2010/0766
Woodlands, Morton Road, Horsell
Erection of part two storey side and rear extension and single storey side and rear extension.
Good news on Horsell Way Mast
This means that 02 will look to put up a mast near Kestrel Way, on Horsell Common Preservation Society (HCPS) land. The site is removed both physically and visibly from homes, schools and businesses. It is a site that has had a good degree of public support.
There was much effort to promote this site at the time of the original Horsell Way mast application , but to no avail. It is a real step forward that 02 are now seriously considering this location. I understand 02 plan to meet Woking BC representatives at the site in the near future.
I will continue to keep residents informed on progress.
Thursday, 12 August 2010
CAB Cuts

Planning Applications 14 August 2010
First one up is an application for a two storey rear extension in Bury Lane. Check out the full details at PLAN/2010/0694/HOU.
And the next one is also for an extension, this time it is both a single and two storey rear extension and a single storey front porch in Heather Close. Full details at PLAN/2010/0730/HOU.
The third application is one listed last week (see below) in Holyoake Crescent. The application has changed so rather than a full planning application it is an "application for a certificate of proposed lawful development". Again this is an extension, single storey, at the rear of the existing property.
BriefUpdates
I've just been asked about the roadworks in Littlewick Road in Horsell. Apparently there have been roadworks on this road for around two weeks - but no sign of any work. I had a look at Surrey County Council's web based list of works but there is nothing there about Littlewick Road. I have contacted Surrey County Council to ask what is happening.
Phone Mast
Still no phone mast application I am pleased to say but vigilance continues and I am on the lookout for anything happening on this.
Arthur's Bridge / Well Lane Junction with Lockfield Drive
I am still awaiting information from the County Council on what has happened since my question to the Local Committee about safety at the Arthurs Bridge / Well Lane junction with Lockfield Drive.
A Credit Union for Woking

Thursday, 5 August 2010
Latest Planning Applications
The first is for the erection of an extension in Holyoake Avenue. A previous application was withdrawn so I am guessing that this is a revised application, maybe following advice from planning officers. Planning application reference PLAN/2010/0695/HOU. The deadline for public comments is not clear on this application. I will update the post when I have that information.
The second application may raise some comment. It is for the site of the Gospel Hall, the single storey hall at the High Street end of Meadway Drive. The site was put up for sale several months ago when the religious group who met there decided to centre their meetings elsewhere in the county, closer to where most of their membership live. The site was sold by auction and an application has now been made to demolish the hall and erect a three storey building containing five flats, each with two bedrooms.
My initial thought was that the height of the buidling was out of keeping with other properties in the area. The surrounding area is a mix of two storey houses and shops with flats above. However on looking at the plans I see that the applicant is proposing a building that appears to be styled to fit in with the houses nearby.
My second thought was parking. Four spaces are proposed at the site. With five flats, each with two bedrooms and the potential for residents to be young people sharing this could mean one person per bedroom so potentially ten vehicles. If couples occupied each room it could mean as many as twenty vehicles. Local roads can't cope with the extra cars. This is a particularly heavily parked road, especially along the section between the High Street and South Close. It gets especially busy at school drop off and pick up time. The site also seems rather small for this building. What do you think? Planning application reference PLAN/2010/0700. The deadline for public comments is 19 August, but in practice comments will be accepted up until the time when the application is considered.
Given the public interest that this application is likely to generate and my concerns on parking at the site in particular I have asked that the application goes before the planning committee.
You can submit your comments on any planning application to Woking Borough Council at the Public Access to Planning website. I would also be interested to hear your views on any planning application. Email me at cllrann-marie.barker@woking.gov.uk
Wednesday, 4 August 2010
Look out for mast applications
Arthur's Bridge / Well Lane Junction awaiting information
Wednesday, 28 July 2010
Update on Arthur's Bridge / Well Lane Junction
In response to my question at the Local Committee I was told that the Safety Review I had asked for could only be done for new junctions. Despite the poor safety record at this junction it seems a Safety Review will not be considered. The County Council did agree to put the matter to another committee concerned with road safety. I haven't had any feedback from that meeting.
When I sought further action I was told that the County Council can't legislate for poor driving. I think this rather misses the point.
Whilst I was considering next steps to improve safety at this dangerous junction I drove right into an accident last Sunday. I was heading for Morrisons supermarket on Sunday afternoon. As I approached the top of Arthur's Bridge Road I became aware of a resident trying to pull out of his drive and another vehicle waiting to make the left turn towards Lockfield Drive. I drove around a parked car and edged into a space. It was then that I realised the traffic wasn't moving onto Lockfield Drive. In the middle of the junction, heading for a right turn onto Lockfield Drive there was a car with the driver's side badly dented. To the left of the junction was another car which I assume had hit the first car. Police were on the seen and directing traffic. Drivers coming out of Arthur's Bridge had to turn left onto Lockfield Drive.
I have seen no information about this accident since Sunday. I hope this means that no serious injury was suffered. This does pose the question as to how many non-injury accidents there may have been at the junction. I have written to the police to see if they have the answer.
Sunday, 4 July 2010

Martyrs Lane recycling site is to close for redevelopment from 12 July. It will remain closed for 22 weeks. This means no local recycling site for Horsell residents until after Christmas.
Benefits of the redevelopment will be:
+ Easier, step free access to the recycling containers
+ Separate entrances for the public and HGVs to help reduce queuing
+ More parking – increasing from 20 to 45 spaces
Whilst the site is closed the alternatives are Slyfield in Guildford and Lyne, near Chertsey. Both alternative sites are a similar distance away from Horsell. Lyne is 4.5 miles away from Martyrs Lane, a total of 7 miles from the centre of Horsell village. Slyfield is 7 miles from Martrys Lane and 6 miles from Horsell Village.
In order to cope with the heaviest demand summer months the two alternative sites will stay open until 7.30pm every evening until the end of September.
The improvements sound very welcome. It is disappointing that the site has to be closed for such a long period. This redevelopment has been talked about for some time and it was originally thought that the site would be able to remain open during the work. I do hope that the redevelopment leaves to an improved system that reduces queues into and around the site. The last time the site was changed several years ago it led actually increased queues.
Wednesday, 30 June 2010
Horsell Way Mast Rears Its Ugly Head

Blog Updates
I am pleased to say that the problem with the connection is hopefully resolved and my blogs will immediately go online in future.
Concerns about key Horsell junction

I experienced some bad driving at that junction just the other day. I came up Arthur’s Bridge to turn right onto Lockfield Drive with one car in front of me and another one behind. For some reason the driver in front of me slowed and put on his hazard lights as the lights changed. I followed slowly behind but was aware of the driver behind me getting impatient, even before the horn he sounded his horn. The car in front finally got moving and went through the pedestrian lights on Lockfield Drive just before they turned to amber. I got there just as the lights turned amber and stopped. The car behind me, which I think it is quite likely had turned right against a red light, raced up into the outer lane and straight through the pedestrian light that was by now turning red.
History
The junction of Arthurs’s Bridge Road with Well Lane and Lockfield Drive has long created local debate. Take a step back more than 10 years to 1998/9 when the closure of this junction was a big local issue. The police had decreed this was a dangerous junction and Woking, which at that time was responsible for highways in the borough, concurred and put up temporary barriers preventing right turns. At this time there were no lights controlling the junction but there were pedestrian crossing lights, as now, on Lockfield Drive.
The closure of the junction led to much protest, residents were concerned about longer journeys and particularly about having to go through the town centre at busy times to travel to the west, especially to Guildford. Others, primarily those living along Well Lane and Arthurs Bridge and roads off, thought the closure would reduce traffic down their roads, and welcomed the closure.
Despite resident’s protests Woking Council was unwilling to re-open the junction and installing traffic lights was seen as a costly solution. The temporary barriers which initially blocked the road, were made permanent and the debate continued.
Eventually funding was agreed for a light controlled junction. Further delays followed due to budgetary pressure but a light controlled junction was finally installed.
The new junction caused further issues. There were concerns about how the traffic and pedestrian lights synchronised. Parents taking their children to Goldsworth School were very worried about safety. Their concerns included the proximity of the two sets of lights and the short interchange between each phase of the lights.
Former county councillor John Doran worked with residents to review the light sequence. Residents petitioned to have the road narrowed to one lane. The light sequence was improved but no the road remained unchanged.
Moving Forward
This latest accident revives all the previous concerns. It is prescient that Surrey’s Local Committee for Woking meets next week. I have submitted a question to the meeting, requesting a safety review of the junction.
If you saw the accident please contact Surrey Police who are seeking witnesses
Budget Reaction

There are worrying cuts planned for the future, with talk of 25% cuts in key departments including the Home Office and Education. Only the health service and overseas aid are protected. These cuts threaten our schools and police service. Most of the costs in a school are the teachers. Could this mean a quarter fewer teachers. Maybe a reduction in teaching assistants? I am a governor at a local infant school which has been at the leading edge of high staffing levels, using teaching assistants to complement trained teachers. The teaching assistants are not used to replace teachers they are part of a team in each class. The loss of this valuable resource would have a significant impact on an ‘outstanding’ school.
My reaction to the budget led me to question what Liberal Democrats want from the coalition and how both the party and the country can gain from this form of governance? A detailed coalition agreement sets down what each party agreed to in order to form the coalition. The Liberal Democrats achieved government commitments for a referendum on a fairer voting system, taking those earning under £10,000 out of the tax system (the budget has at least made a start on this objective), a pupil premium to assist disadvantaged pupils and restoration of the link between pensions and earnings.
I can’t be totally happy with the budget. I have concerns about further cuts to come. I am reassured that with or without Liberal Democrat support the Conservatives were likely to have increased VAT. Being part of the coalition means the Liberal Democrats can get some policies through and can restrict or restrain some Conservative policies.
The end of free swimming?

I have to confess to having less knowledge of how useful the scheme was for older people but I can imagine it was of great benefit to those on a fixed income. One less thing to pay for is always welcome.
I’m particularly unhappy that the scheme is set to end in July, just as the school holidays begin. Several years ago, during a brief period of Lib Dem control of Woking Council, we were keen to provide free swimming, although just for school holiday periods. The scheme was trialled over an Easter holiday and was popular. Local police figures showed a drop in anti-social behaviour during that holiday period, Hardly conclusive I know but I do firmly believe that offering young people some positive activity to fill their time with, that is accessible to all, can play a part in reducing less desirable behaviour.
I note that Liberal Democrats in Three Rivers, Hertfordshire are keeping the free swimming scheme running, at least to the end of the school holidays. Wouldn’t it be great if Woking Council could do the same?
Fox Concerns

Golden Farewell to Humfrey

I can understand that it is appropriate to pay a resettlement grant to those MPs who lose their seats at an election. It would seem particularly necessary for those who may have moved to, or lived in their constituency and who may now need to relocate in order to find alternative employment. This does not apply to Mr Malins. He never took it upon himself to live among the people he represented here in Woking and he stood down by choice. I believe he continued his ‘other job’ as a crown court recorder throughout his parliamentary career. On this basis I fail to understand why he should receive this huge amount of money. One assumes he his life will continue as before, he’ll just be doing one less job.
Maybe Humfrey would like to make a parting gift to Woking from his windfall – a donation to the local hospice would be a popular choice. Alternatively he could give the £50,000 to George Osborne to help plug the hole in the country’s finances.
Saturday, 8 May 2010
Next steps
There are three main strands that I will focus on in the coming weeks
Getting Informed
I need to be up to data on current Council issues, my role as a councillor and the issues that my predecessor (Richard Sanderson) has been dealing with in Horsell. I was a councillor between 2004 and 2008 so this gives me some advantage over a 'virgin' councillor but I am sure I still have much to learn over the coming weeks and months. We have an informal meeting of Lib Dem councillors this weekend, I am attending an induction for all new councillors early next week and Richard and I will get together for a briefing session later in the week.
Finding my role on the Council
All councillors attend full council meetings and need to work with the rest of the group to decide which committees they should sit on. For the group running the Council several members need to serve on the Executive which runs the Council and sets policy direction. The Overview and Scrutiny Committee casts a critical eye over Council decisions. Then there are two essential committees with regulatory powers - Planning and Licensing. Planning is the committee that residents are most likely to have encountered. Planning applications go before the committee for everything from a household extension to a major new development. Licensing looks after all licensed premises, pubs and bars, late night opening of restaurants and cafes. Finally the Standards Committee is responsible for ensuring high standards of conduct among councillors and looks at any legislation involving standards, as they relate to the borough council and the Appeals committee deals with appeals on homelessness.
I need to find my role, one that will best represent Horsell and use my existing knowledge and experience. I was Vice-Chair of an Overview and Scrutiny Committee (there used to be several) and Chair of Licensing Committee during my previous time on the Council. However, planning matters are important and I should maybe consider this committee. Richard Sanderson was on the committte in the past.
Listening to residents and setting priorities
The previous two strands are important and necessary, but most important of all is taking forward your priorities. I would like to work with the County Council to improve road safety. I will push again for real, effective traffic calming in Brewery Road; measure to slow traffc in South Road, tackling parking in the village centre, dealing with commuter parking. I will follow closely plans for a WWF HQ on Brewery Road car park and raise resident's serious concerns. I'd like to see more youth provision in the village.
But what about you? What are your priorities? What do you think I should be doing in the coming weeks and months. Please comment on here or send me an email, drop me a line or telephone. All my details are available from the Council but for now use my personal email annmarie.barker@gmail.com as it will take a while for me to be set up on council systems.
Once I have all your ideas I will post on here, letting you know what I will be working on, in the short, medium and long term. I will then report back on progress. I look foward to hearing from you.
Elected - Thank you very much everybody
Ann-Marie Barker 1852
Conservative 1805
UKIP 245
Labour 217
Thank you to everybody for all your votes. Of course the General Election pushed up the turnout but I do feel very humbled that more than 1800 Horsell residents gave me their support.
A huge thank you to my team, particularly Richard Sanderson and his wife Sarah. Richard has represented Horsell as a councillor for more than a quarter of a century and Sarah has been behind him all the way. I hope I can carry on Richard's good work over the coming four years. I wish Richard well in his 'retirement' . Big thanks are also due to John Doran, former Horsell county councillor, who has been a stalwart of Horsell campaigns over a number of years. Rob Payne, as ever, did a wonderful job getting our poster boards up, and promptly down again. Margot and John Craig were always there to lend a hand. Many others played their part, helping us to deliver literature, canvass and prepare material. Thank you to everybody. It couldn't have been done without you.
Monday, 3 May 2010
Would you vote Labservative?

May Fair on Wheatsheaf Common
As ever the scouts and guides put on a great show, from tug of war and it's a knockout for the children, through the brilliant Karen Clarke dancers, birds of prey, martial arts and a fire brigade rescue demonstration. My younger daughter was fascinated by the man being rescued from a car by the fire brigade. She also loved the big slide and mini-waltzers.
We walked around the fair with Lib Dem parliamentary candidate Rosie Sharpley who had some interesting chats with our Horsell neighbourhood police officer, the local fire brigade and local residents.
Horsell Residents signed up some new members, there was much interest in Horsell Common Preservation Society and I was pleased to see they now have postcards of the Pegasus sculpture on Broomhall Common.
A hot topic of conversation for me was what class our children would be in when they start at Horsell Village this September. Didn't find anyone else who'll be in the same class but did learn about somebody we know from a local toddler group.
Saturday, 1 May 2010
Judge a man by the company he keeps ....?
It certainly rang alarm bells for me when I saw that the Tory Euro MP who called the NHS "a 60 year mistake" had been in Woking supporting the Tory candidate.
It seems to run counter to the Tory candidate's claims to support the NHS.
In election literature our 'local' Tory talks about his role on the Surrey Health Scrutiny Committee. He says that he has been working to secure the future of Woking Community Hospital. Sounds good doesn't it? Rather a shame then, that when he had an opportunity to vote against the loss of beds at Cranleigh Community Hospital (in his county council division), he sat on his hands. Only one person on the committee voted to save beds at Cranleigh Community Hospital - Rosie Sharpley, Liberal Democrat candidate for Woking.
Thursday, 29 April 2010
Parking Issues
Sunday, 25 April 2010
Conservative Concerns

Saturday, 17 April 2010
Mad March Hares
Over in Brookwood a new traffic island, dubbed "Fishwick Island" by local residents, in reference to a senior county council officer, like the Brewery Road posts appeared in late March. The island is meant to help pedestrians and cyclists cross the A322 Bagshot Road, in the run up to Brookwood Crossroads. It is located opposite the Total petrol station and is on a direct route betwen two parts of the canal bank. Residents were surprised to see the island appear close to an existing combined pedestrian and cycle crossing. According to local residents the crossing affects cars wanting to make a right turn at the crossroads and has led to some motorists driving around the island (potentially against on-coming traffic).
The island appeared around 20 March and residents knew nothing until it was in place. See the website set up by residents here.
A further piece of County Council folly is detailed on the getsurrey website. Surrey has had to take out a cycle lane in Leatherhead, which cost 70K to install. The cycle lane was too narrow and featured numerous obstructions. In an attempt to widen the path Surrey used paint that made the path slippery when wet.
Wednesday, 14 April 2010
Still no response on those posts
I have yet to find anybody who thinks the posts serve any useful purpose . Taking a trip along Brewery Road you can now watch pedestrians dancing and weaving to find a way past each other on the new narrowed path.
Three weeks to election day ...
Tuesday, 6 April 2010
On your marks, get set, go ...

Sunday, 4 April 2010
When is a flood not a flood?
Still no response
I have seen a reply to a local councillor on the erection of the posts and it confirms my suspicion that they were funded from some money left in the budget at the end of the year.
I wish they had put that money into something that would benefit the local area. I don't have to go far to suggest several things they could do, just in Brewery Road, such as:
- Stopping the flooding that makes it dangerous to cross at the zebra on the route from the car park to Horsell Park and threatens pedestrians with a free cold shower
- Filling in the potholes on Brewery Road that are growing by the day
- Re-surface Brewery Road
And of course the list gets longer the further I travel , but this is indicative of the issues facing us all over Horsell and Woking.
Wednesday, 31 March 2010
Last Post ...
Saturday, 27 March 2010
More on those posts
Thursday, 25 March 2010
Concerned about traffic posts on Brewery Road

I think the massed effect of these posts is going to be ugly and intrusive. They will really spoil what is currently a green view across Horsell Moor, defined by trees, shrubs and grass.
The posts are positioned quite a way into the pavement so will reduce pavement width, quite critical as the pavement narrows as it approaches Horsell Moor. I will be difficult for people to pass as the road narrows towards the road into Horsell Moor and quite a problem for double buggies.
Residents haven't been consulted on the erection of the posts and people I have spoken to so far are not convinced that traffic speeds will be reduced.
I have written to the County Council officer involved raising my concerns, as has local Lib Dem councillor Richard Sanderson. Despite being an elected representative in Horsell he was not informed of the County Council's plans.
I believe the posts are being erected because there is some money left in the budget at the end of the year. Residents are not to get their long awaited traffic calming, despite this having been proposed by former Lib Dem county councillor John Doran a number of years ago. I understand the budget is frozen for all road safety schemes for the coming financial year. This scheme appears to be a sop to Brewery Road residents. In my view the County Council are wasting their money. Residents want real traffic calming.
Monday, 22 March 2010
Taking A Stand

- I was successful, against Conservative opposition, in requiring neighbours to be directly informed about applications for extended hours or entertainment licences from licensed premises
- I informed residents about plan for mobile phone masts
- I ensured residents knew about major planning applications
Local Policing on the National Stage
Do Conservatives Really Want to Listen?
Unfortunately I wasn't able to attend the event - conflicting pressure of husband, older daughter and me all wanting to be in different places at the same time and a younger daughter to get to bed. From reports I have heard it sounds like I didn't miss much. It was not so much a question time as a talk at you time. I recognise that there is a need for a certain amount of introduction and scene setting required at this type of event but when an event is billed as a community question time you would expect the floor to open up to public questions with the minimum of preamble. Not so at this event apparently.
The funny thing is a local Conservative is now suggesting that a quarterly or twice yearly event that moves around the borough would be a good idea. It's a great idea and one that was put in place under the theme 'Tune In' through a local Liberal Democrat initiative.
I did see the term 'Tune In' on some advertising for last week's event, but it was a misnomer. The purpose of 'Tune In' was to hold a regular dialogue in the community. As with last week's event the various local service providers got together. The difference was that there were several events around the borough, based on policing areas. One 'Tune In' event was held in each area before the Conservatives quietly forgot all about it. 'Tune In' set a framework and really engaged local people. I attended two events, in Horsell and in Goldsworth Park, both were packed and there were many people keen to play ar part in their local community. As far as I can see all that is left of the initiative is 'clean-up days' in some areas. These are great events and a good chance for the community to work together but Tune In was meant to be so much more.
Friday, 19 March 2010
You Don't Have to Clean Your Wheely Bin

Hot on the heels of my experience with the dodgy burglar alarm company I hear news of a company offering to clean wheely bins. Nothing wrong with this. Some residents may appreciate having their wheely bins cleaned for a fee. The issue with this company, according to BBC News is that they tell residents that Woking Council requires their bins to be cleaned to meet council standards. Woking Council has confirmed that it does 'advise' residents to keep their bins clean but it does not employ a company to enforce bin cleanliness. The company concerned uses the name 'Woking Wheelie Bins'.
Wednesday, 17 March 2010
Beware of Callers Offering Free Burglar Alarms

Tuesday, 16 March 2010
National Parking Award for Brewery Road but WBC still want to build over it
It is nice to get national recognition and I am sure residents appreciate having clean and safe car parks but, this refurbishment is hardly 'recent' and it seems incredible that WBC is taking praise for a car park they seek to build on just as soon as they can.
A classic quote in the Council's press release says "It is also clear the Council has a strategy for ensuring the parking environments are well maintained into the future." Well, I hate to tell you 'Parking Review' and 'British Parking Association' but this one is not planned to be well maintained into the future. WBC plans to replace the car park with an office block. The site will still provide car parking but at least some will have to be above or below ground.
Parking in Horsell to avoid expensive Woking car parks

Clearing up Horsell

Monday, 15 March 2010
Inaccurate Conservative bar charts
Now, you would think, that for an election in Woking the local Conservatives, who under the incumbent MP Humfrey Malins had a majority of 6612 at the last general election would want to a bar chart showing the local situation. But no, perhaps the Lib Dems are just a bit too close for comfort, especially when Mr Malins is standing down and they only get around to selecting a marketing man from outside of Woking to fight their corner late last year.
The Conservatives have gone for the national general election result in their bar chart - and they can't even get that right!
Saturday, 13 March 2010
Living in the UK's 'pothole capital'
Friday, 12 March 2010
Poll says no to Wolsey purchase
I think the Council stil has some work to do if it is to convince residents of Woking that this purchase was a good idea.
Threat to Local Fire Service

Following a county council meeting on Friday the Executive member responsible said she could not "confirm or deny" rumours of up to 60 job losses.
I am concerned about the way this is being handled by Surrey County Council. The future of the fire service was due to be discussed in an open meeting, with public and press attending. At some point this decision was changed and the public and press were asked to leave the meeting.
The local press are also reporting that Surrey twice misssed out on a chance to get additional funding through not submitting a business plan on time.
Horsell on Google Streeet View
It is interesting to work out when Google filmed here. On Wheatsheaf Common Carters Steam Fair vehicles are in situ. This puts the date to mid September. On the corner of Broomhall Common and the Brewery Cut footpath there is a bare tree stump but no amazing Pegaus carving so filming must have been before 2009. Church Hill is closed and there is a water company van on the village side. My best guess at the moment is September 2008.
This is certainly a fascinating way to look around the area. It is very much a street (or road view). As far as I can see none of the footpaths are covered through Horsell and you can't even take the route from Brewery Road car park to the town centre.
Sections were obviously filmed at different times. Check out a dry Brewery Road (in the main) but a very sodden High Street and surrounding roads.
Here's Brewery Road and the car park entrance.
Tuesday, 2 March 2010

Tories reject plans to slow traffic in Horsell Village
Evidence shows that a pedestrian struck by a vehicle driving at 20mph is likely to suffer slight injuries. At 30mph a pedestrian is more likely to be severely hurt and if hit by a vehice driving at 40mph or more a pedestrian is likely to be killed.
Lib Dem run Portsmouth has shown that all is needed for such a 20mph scheme is to erect 20mph signs. This has been done in Portsmouth and they now have evidence of reduced accident rates.
The sad thing is that Surrey now has a policy to support 20mph zones, having shown little interest in the past. What a pity they can't put their own policies into practice.
Monday, 1 March 2010
Will Lord Ashcroft pay his back taxes?
Lord Ashcroft is a Deputy Chairman of the Conservative party and is currently using his millions to fund campaigns to elect Conservatives in target seats. The BBC suggests he has spent £4 Million in Tory target seats in recent years and that he has been the largest single Tory donor since 2005.
However, credit where its due. Lord Ashcroft has finally come clean. About time too! He now appears to say that, if his party leader, dear Dave, goes through with plans for “anyone in the Lords to be resident and domiciled” he will pay UK tax. Mind you he doesn’t state this explicitly. Oh no. He says he agrees with Dave’s plans on the Lords and that he expects to be sitting in the Lords for many years. Maybe he knows that Dave won’t get around to requiring the Lords to be ‘resident and domiciled’ for many years.
I can’t help but compare this to a Mr or Mrs Jo Public who rely wholly or partly on benefits. Their status changes, maybe through employment, it could just be a few hours extra work. If this is not declared, and the relevant agency finds out about a change in status, immediate amendment to benefit payments will be required. Mr or Mrs Public will also have to pay anything that has been overpaid.
Surely Lord Ashcroft is effectively over paying himself. He is not giving up the tax that we ordinary citizens have to pay on the money that we earn. Now he implies that, if the law changes, he will pay UK tax. About time too. But my question is will you be paying your back tax Lord Ashcroft?